The Indelible Marker: Stained leadership risks fewer talent referrals
The great talents working for a company constitute the foundation of its success, which is why a strong employer brand is one of a company’s strongest assets, it needs to be nurtured and continuously reassessed as a basis for future improvement.
Many do not realise that leadership is crucial for a trustworthy and efficient employer branding. It holds an indelible marker in its hands and every action management takes marks the tone.
A less favourable/thoughtful move can leave a long-term ugly stain, jeopardizing talent attraction, employee experience and customer care even the survival of the business.
- What are the pitfalls of a stained culture and employer brand?
- Why does leadership play a significant role in building and strengthening a company’s employer branding?
- How can you ensure strong leadership throughout your organisation to make a company and brand credible?
Traditionally when thinking about employer branding, it is often associated with pure marketing gigs to create a buzz and attract talent without having reflected on the entire employee experience journey.
If what is proposed externally, the employer value proposition, is not aligned with the culture and what is actually happening internally, talent will not only experience the mismatch, but they will also feel long term deception. Like Titanic, your company will soon sink if you do not respect and align the corporate culture with what is projected in public. In other words, what happens on the inside, is reflected on the outside – regardless of how strong your marketing is. This will always impact your competitiveness:
Throughout history, many companies have burnt their fingers in the competitive market due to such a mismatch and today more than ever – given the easy access and existence of information and platforms like Glassdoor where companies are clearly rated for their employer brand by (potential) employees – the employer brand can strongly influence the popularity and success of companies.
Authentic leadership is one of the key components of a healthy and successful company culture.
A German proverb when translated literally goes “The fish starts to stink from the head”. Seen figuratively, if the leader is not leading with integrity, is not acting as a role-model living both vision and values through actions, behaviour and talk, then the entire culture risks having a fatal impact on the durable success of the company.
Building trust and leading by example is however not as straight forward as one might think. Take today’s access to studies on company popularity amongst applicants and employees. A company can quickly move either up or down the Top 10 list for most appreciated employers – and just as quickly find itself in the Top 10 of worst employers to work for.
To give two contrasting examples, think of the popularity of Patagonia today. They are one of the most sought-after companies to work for thanks to their vision and values of creating a sustainable clothing brand and “using business to protect nature”. Because they constantly instill their CSR strategy and the related values into their employee culture from the moment people are hired. They achieve this by weighing interests, values and volunteer work as highly as professional competencies throughout the employee journey and beyond, thus encouraging the same values outside work and giving employees time to live the values and common interests. Leadership, including shareholders, supports and lives the strategy and vision to the fullest and the ethical vision is constantly measured in terms of environmental impact, labour conditions and animal welfare.
In contrast, among the top 20 most-hated companies, you find the media organisation Vice Media. While it has been a disruptive force in digital news content, it has experienced a severe PR crisis impacting not only its popularity among customers, but even more so its loyalty and trust of employees resulting in a highly damaged employer branding. The crisis of accusations of a toxic culture of sexism and sexual harassment was found to be mainly permitted and carried out by senior company employees, leading to the suspension of the president and the chief digital officer. A clear case of how poor and unethical leadership can break a brand – both in the market and in the “war for loyal and committed talent”. An indelible stain on leadership with a high price to pay; it will take a long time to recover from this negative impact.
One mistake that is often made is to assume that leaders are only at the top of an organisation or in certain positions. While managers are easy to identify thanks to their titles and positions, (informal) leaders are everywhere and come in many shapes & sizes. To name a few, they can be employees active in charities and associations outside the company, they can be employees influencing teams, projects or committees within the company. While they are sometimes obvious to spot, sometimes such informal leaders are less prominent, yet they can all have a lasting impact on both internal and external stakeholders.
For this reason, it is important to support the growth of everyone’s leadership along the way. To help them not only to become a person with a title, but also a person of integrity and inspiration, a trusted support and advisor within the organisation as well as within the industry and even beyond.
In the long run, this will help the company to position itself and will impact the internal culture at all three levels of the company culture, as well as the external projection in the employer branding.
Inspired by the model of 5 levels of leadership by John C Maxwell, it is imperative to look at the following levels of leadership maturity when building your brand as a leader – impacting the culture and (employer) brand of the company:
- People development
Leadership is a process, not a position. Nonetheless within organisations many leaders start at this level of “position”, as they receive the title through a promotion. It is closely related to the discussions around whether a person is a leader or a manager, as at this level a title is needed to influence and get things done.
A survey from 2006 mentions how in Germany 50% of people did not feel engaged with their manager or organisation. With this in mind, it is imperative that the company gives a level 1 leader the support and training s/he needs to grow his/her leadership together with a certain openness and commitment to the consistent personal growth required.
Positional leaders often focus on serving themselves or their organisation, with too little regard for others. However, leaders who move up to level 2 shift their focus from me to we. At this stage a leader builds on relationships under the motto “You can like people without leading them, but you cannot lead people well without liking them”. The relation is built on trust and personal interaction
“Leaders become great, not because of their own power, but because of their ability to empower others.” In other words, at this level a leader steps up to become a mentor to support individuals in growing and becoming leaders themselves, which again extends their own impact and influence. While this approach leads the organisation as a whole towards sustainable growth and success, the challenge at this stage is to consistently put the identified potential leader’s growth before your own.
Maxwell suggests the 80%-20% rule: spending 80% on developing your team and 20% on productive work. It is not possible to focus on everyone, so this really applies to identifying the 20% with most potential to empower to fulfil their responsibilities; thus enabling them to lead larger and continuously grow within the organisation.
The final maturity level of leadership is the most influential both within and outside the organisation.
The 5 levels of leadership align leadership practices, principles, and values by combining all levels of leadership and by providing an extended platform for leading, thus giving space to other leaders at the top, ensuring continuity long after his/her departure.
A level 5 leader creates a legacy within and around the organisation – at times even as an industry game changer. S/he is remembered beyond his/her time and s/he leaves “behind him/her in others the convictions and the will to carry on”. Leaders, such as Jack Welch from General Electrics are remembered within the industry for an honoured reputation of a company culture focusing on developing Level 4 Leaders for tomorrow: producing leaders for the future. Thanks to the snowball effect, leaders are per se empowered to lead larger and lift the leadership lid for everyone in the organisation. It remains a mindset and part of the company DNA, shining through on the outside – through reputation and employer value proposition – making it a desired and attractive place to work.
With the 5 maturity levels of leadership in mind, it is important to remember that every employee need not be on the same level. This is what makes it so challenging to keep moving up the levels requiring consistent growth.
Despite this and with reference to the maturity level “position”, leaders often remain at this stage for too long harming their own growth and that of both team-members and the general organisation.
In this context, it is all the more interesting to learn from a Gallup poll of over one million workers in the US, that the number one reason why workers quit was in order to leave a bad manager, with 75% of those who left doing so because of their boss and not the job itself.
This not only has a negative influence on the immediate team members, it throws a bad light on the organisation’s employee experience which again automatically impacts the employer branding.
As a manager and/or leader it is always important to reflect on one’s human connections and cultural impact on an individual, team and at organisational level. It is essential to keep all cultural levels in mind with a focus on respectfully building trusting relationships and taking understandable decisions based on clear values and purpose. This also empowers team members to grow and advance by leading with integrity.
Only through mature leadership is it possible to build a sustainable organisation with a culture of empowered, committed and engaged employees. This will automatically catalyse popularity and reputation creating a “high-end” employer branding.
To conclude a company’s reputation is only as authentic as its leadership, which is only as strong as the team that stands behind it. As the Afghan proverb goes:
We are here to support you! Get in touch today, via firstname.lastname@example.org or by calling us a +352 43 93 666 770
 Three levels of cultural change: Organisational, Team and individual, see Framework online: https://www.mindforest.com/what-titanic-can-teach-us-about-employer-branding-and-company-culture/?lang=en [19.07.2021]
 John C. Maxwell, 2011 : “The 5 Levels of Leadership”, p. 87
 John C. Maxwell, 2011: “The 5 Levels of Leadership”, p.8
 John C. Maxwell, 2011: “The 5 Levels of Leadership”, p. 135
 John C. Maxwell, 2011: “The 5 Levels of Leadership”, p. 9
 Quote from Walter Lippmann